“Innovation is very simple in my humanitarian work.”

This feedback, recently given in RedR’s training on humanitarian innovation in Addis Ababa, may not strike a chord with you. In fact, while we all recognise on the power of innovation, we also find it quite intimidating. By its very nature, there is no blueprint for innovation. Which leaves us with an uncomfortable conclusion. Whose job is it to innovate? It might be me. 

Our recent innovation training for the ToGETHER Programme led by NGO Welthungerhilfe brought together 113 participants from local and international NGOs based in nine different countries: Bangladesh, Pakistan, Myanmar, Indonesia, Ethiopia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia, Germany, and Colombia. The training was designed to build a culture of innovation, and equip participants with the tools to create innovation in their own roles and organisations, to better serve communities affected by disaster. 

We speak to two RedR Trainers, Alejandro Castañeda and Ahmed Hassan, who facilitated two of the five innovation training sessions we held in four cities around the world. What does real innovation look like? Whose responsibility? And how do we make it happen? 

Simpler than you think

Real innovation always arises from the space given for understanding real problems, and listening to the right people. Alejandro is an experienced Sphere trainer. In the Venezuelan Migrant Crisis in Colombia which intensified in 2015, Alejandro became convinced that the best support for Venezuelan migrants would come from cash transfer – an innovative and burgeoning form of humanitarian support. 

Yes, innovation is your responsibility

Innovation often seems as if it can only be pursued on a macro scale. How can we implement it as a culture in the humanitarian sector? As Ahmed explains, at the beginning of the training in Addis Ababa the participants “never thought about innovation as something related to their work. Innovation seemed too big, and not suitable for where we are.”  

Similarly, in the Colombian context for the RedR innovation training in Bogotá, Alejandro says “there were great expectations on the first day … some were expecting direct answers on how they should innovate in the humanitarian sector. In the end, they understood that the training provided tools that allow them to innovate. In the end, it is up to each humanitarian worker to generate spaces for innovation, thinking of the people affected.” 

Innovation happens when each humanitarian shifts their mindset. Rather than a task for someone else, it is integrally linked to the approach they take to their own role. Far from placing a burden of responsibility onto the individual, however, this mindset shift that Ahmed and Alejandro facilitated through this training should give new freedom and capacity to the individual to bring innovation in their own context, in relation to their own responsibilities. The training gives participants the space and tools to consider the question – are the methods I use really the best way of solving the problems I face? 

As Ahmed, an experienced humanitarian leader, notes, “if you stay the same you will be left behind.” As an illustration of this mindset shift in action, some participants in Addis Ababa brought a real example from their own roles – managing the life-threatening flooding of the Shebelle river in Hiran region, Somalia. Giving space in the training the diverse group of participants including young and old, experienced and newly recruited Ethiopian and Somali participants from different organisations, able to discuss outside the box ideas – using fencing, or bells to create an early warning system, and working harder to understand the community response. Ethiopian participants shared ideas from their own experiences with  flooding, and they also discussed how to able such a solution – specifically, how to effectively pitch innovation to a potential donor. 

“Innovation”, as Ahmed explains, “is about empowering individuals with the tools to discover   their own solutions. By providing these tools, individuals can adapt them to their unique contexts and circumstances.” 

Those tools, transferred by the training, centre on the Human Centred Design approach to innovation, distinctive for its emphasis on empathy and deep understanding of the needs, behaviours, and experiences of users, insistence on user involvement throughout a design process, and iterative model of testing and refinement. 

Yes, innovation is possible

People need space to consider, listen, and discuss. They need tools and knowledge. They need – in a word – capacity. 

“Building capacity among local people creates innovation”, says Ahmed. “While abundant resources exist, the issue often lies in the lack of access to these resources for local communities.  By bringing together spaces, people, resources, and tools , individuals can access what they need to develop innovative solutions to the challenges they face in responding to disasters.  

If humanitarian innovation is as simple as giving talented, experienced humanitarians some breathing space and the tools to think, it’s as simple as a new way of viewing ourselves. Ahmed says that his training participants had never thought about humanitarian innovation before – in fact, they had thought that humanitarianism is singularly not innovative. “Now”, he says, “they were able to apply innovation in their own real problems”.

Commemorating the 20th Anniversary of the Canal Hotel bombing in Iraq on this World Humanitarian Day, guest contributor and RedR Associate Trainer Ian Woodmansey reflects upon the profound impact of this event on the humanitarian community.  

This blog was written by guest contributor Ian Woodmansey. Ian is a RedR UK Associate Trainer. You can find him on LinkedIn and Twitter.

We want to honour the memory of those humanitarian workers who lost their lives. The day also, however, serves as a stark reminder of the evolving security risks faced by aid workers. Since that event, security risk management within the humanitarian sector has never been the same.  

In this blog, we will delve into the changes that have taken place over the past two decades, the evolving security landscape, the efficacy of World Humanitarian Day, and the steps we can take to ensure the safety of those who selflessly serve in times of crisis. 

A changing security landscape

22 people lost their lives in the Canal Hotel bombing in Iraq in 2003. The bombing marked a turning point for the humanitarian community’s approach to security risk management, underscoring the vulnerability of aid workers and the pressing need for a comprehensive security framework. 

The landscape of security threats faced by humanitarian organizations has evolved significantly since the Canal Hotel bombing. While traditional risks such as armed conflict, natural disasters, and disease outbreaks persist, new and complex challenges have emerged or grown. Terrorism, cyberattacks, political instability, and the rise of non-state actors have added layers of complexity to the security equation. 

Humanitarian organisations now grapple with the need to adapt. The blending of security and humanitarian action has become imperative, demanding a delicate balance between delivering aid and ensuring the safety of aid workers. 

The sector’s approach has switched from reactive to proactive

Over the past 20 years, there has been a notable shift from a reactive to a proactive approach in addressing security risks. Humanitarian organisations have become more vigilant in assessing potential threats, implementing risk reduction strategies, and providing specialised training for staff operating in high-risk environments. Advancements in technology have played a crucial role, from satellite imagery and geospatial analysis to communication tools and digital security measures. Collaborative efforts between governments, NGOs, and the private sector have further facilitated the sharing of information and resources, contributing to a more coordinated response to security challenges. First the European then the Global InterAgency Security Forum, as well as INSO, have played a central role in improving information sharing and coordination between agencies. 

World Humanitarian Day is an important reminder

World Humanitarian Day serves as a global platform to recognise and celebrate the unwavering dedication of aid workers who risk their lives to alleviate human suffering. It sheds light on the risks they take and raises awareness about the challenges they face. While it may not directly impact the security measures put in place by organisations, it contributes significantly to acknowledging the importance of humanitarian work and fostering a sense of solidarity among people worldwide. 

There are several ways to strengthen safety measures

• Training and Preparedness: Continuous training in security protocols, first aid, and conflict resolution is essential for aid workers operating in high-risk environments. Organisations should prioritise developing specialised training programs that cater to evolving security threats. 
• Collaboration and Information Sharing: Humanitarian organisations must strengthen collaboration with governments, security agencies, and local communities to gather intelligence and exchange information about potential threats. 
• Adaptive Security Strategies: Flexibility and adaptability are crucial. Organisations should constantly evaluate and adjust their security protocols based on changing conditions on the ground. 
• Mental Health Support: Providing psychological support to aid workers exposed to trauma and high-stress environments is paramount. Mental health services should be readily accessible and destigmatised. 
• Technological Innovation: Investing in cutting-edge technology, such as real-time tracking systems and encrypted communication tools, can enhance the safety of aid workers and the effectiveness of their operations. 

The Canal Hotel bombing serves as a sombre milestone. It galvanized the humanitarian community into action, leading to significant advancements in security risk management. 

While challenges persist and the nature of security threats continues to evolve, the unwavering commitment of aid workers remains a beacon of hope. World Humanitarian Day continues to shine a spotlight on their vital contributions. It’s a reminder that there is more to be done to ensure the safety of everyone caught up in humanitarian crisis. In fostering collaboration and embracing innovation, security can advance, rather than hinder work to support affected communities. 

Clean water. Hot food. Safe roads. These are everyday necessities. But for many people, they are still out of reach.

RedR has embarked on an innovative partnership to support humanitarian engineering innovations looking to meet some of these challenges in Uganda. This is in collaboration with the Uganda Institution of Professional Engineers (UIPE) and the College of Engineering, Design, Art and Technology (CEDAT) at Makerere University, and made possible thanks to generous donations from WSP, Ramboll, and The Royal Academy of Engineering.

First, our Humanitarian Skills for Engineers training course strengthened the capacity of engineers in Uganda to lead such a project. Then, participants were awarded a microgrant of £3000 to enable them to practice the new skills acquired in the training, in partnership with a local NGO, for the benefit of a local community. Read on for the transformation brought by four different projects completed across Uganda.

Annet Nsiimire: Clean Energy and new life in Rwamwanja Refugee Settlement

The Rwamwanja Refugee Settlement in South-western Uganda is home to more than 78,000 people. Most are women and children, who have fled over the border from the conflict in North Kivu in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Rwamwanja had an urgent need for clean energy. At the Mahani reception centre, residents with specific health issues receive cooked meals. The clean energy system used by the residents was, however, in disrepair and difficult to use.

Annet Nsiimire was able to use her microgrant to bring change. She began a partnership with NGO Advance Africa to renovate twelve cooking stoves at Mahani, allowing the residents to cook with clean energy. The installation also included dimmer switches to allow heat to be regulated, greatly improving the cooking experience.

For Annet, it was a significant priority to empower the women and girls in Rwamwanja to use clean energy. Almost all households sampled in Annet’s community engagement exercise use firewood as a primary fuel, taking women and girls a minimum of two hours per day, every day, to collect. “It takes not less than six hours to collect firewood and get back home”, said one respondent. The women in Rwamwanja explained that in such daily journeys, the women and girls who go risk violent attack and sexual abuse, as well other threats such as snake bites. “Many times”, explained another respondent, “children are abused and beaten by landowners when looking for fuel, which may include agricultural residues and dung. Running away, they are cut by barbed wire.” Another respondent revealed that “the energy crisis is worse for refugees, because trees in settlement zones are marked, and no refugee is allowed to cut any tree. Members of the host community cut them.”

“Collection and use of fuels is a life-threatening activity”, says Annet. The use of clean energy, however, liberates women and girls from this dangerous daily labour, which causes conflict and degrades the environment. Annet has already seen the impact of repairing the clean energy stoves.

“Immediately after the project,” she says, “new arrivals came in, two mothers among them and gave birth. Because of the easy access to clean fuel, it was very easy to fix quick meals and access warm water to bathe the newborn babies. When I heard of this it was really fulfilling to my heart. Our project was making a difference in the community, supporting the babies’ first moments along with their mothers at such a significant time.”

Annet is now a Trainer on the Humanitarian Skills for Engineers course, passing on her skills and experience to new cohorts of humanitarian engineers, and multiplying the impact of her expertise.

Oryem John Speke: Access and empowerment in Iyer Communities

The rural access road to the Iyer village communities in Agago District, Northern Uganda, is often submerged. During the rainy season, residents are forced to travel an extra ten kilometres for basic services. No vehicles reach them. Humanitarian Skills for Engineers participant Oryem John Speke met members of the Organisation for African Social Development (OASD) at a RedR UK event in Kampala. With RedR UK microgrant funding, they planned a project to install culverts and drainage systems under the road, to transform the lives of people in the three Iyer village communities.

Previous culverts installed to draw water away from the road were not effective – they had been laid as part of political campaigns, without professional guidance. John’s team reinstalled this old material, along with a new bridge, so that the way to markets, employment opportunities, and health and education facilities would never be cut off by floodwater. The new culverts were tried and tested during the rainy season in April and May, where they swept away flash flood water without affecting the new bridge or the road.

Mobilising the community made the project a success. John and the dedicated OASD team collaborated tirelessly, engaging local and district leaders, stakeholders, and community members with the right message. “There has been an increase in the community’s awareness of their role in community development”, says John. The people of Iyer were mobilised to provide local resources, including finance, tools, and labour. “The project has also promoted unity in the community”.

A significant achievement was the participation of women and girls. John took care to ensure they contributed to the decision-making process and planning, as well as implementation. “I helped them to know that they can do anything the men do, from setting out project site and masonry, to clearance of the site, and the reinstatement of the environment”, shares John. “I had to give them opportunities to show what they are capable of”. 20 women and girls worked on the installation of the project. “Thus,” explains John, “women have come to learn and participate in the community at large, and they are seen as valuable. When it started, people in the community would say that women cannot do this job. But during implementation phase, they were seeing the benefits!”

The Iyer communities still face many challenges, including the most pressing – no access to safe water during dry seasons. OASD has introduced a social development plan to community members. They will continue to work with them in the coming months, opening an office at Iyer Tekulo to implement more life-changing projects.

John and OASD have already jointly written a proposal for water supply, irrigation, and a solar powered water pump, and they are now looking for a sponsor to help provide clean water year-round for the whole Iyer community, as well as installing additional culverts for other access roads.

Swaib Semiyaga: Water and welcome at Rhino Camp Refugee Settlement

Rhino Camp Refugee Settlement in Madi-Okollo, northwestern Uganda, houses more than 130,000 refugees. Most of them have fled conflict in South Sudan.

Engineer Swaib Semiyaga, a Humanitarian Skills for Engineers participant, used a RedR UK microgrant to bring change for new arrivals to the settlement, partnering with the Arua District Water and Sanitation Association (ADWASA).

Two refugee reception centers in the Rhino Camp Settlement did not have easy-to-use handwashing points. Swaib explains, “a WASH project in a refugee setting requires regular maintenance to ensure that channel blockages and leakages are worked on. Pipes and valves are always vandalized.”

Working with ADWASA, Swaib coordinated the installation of four new water points, with reduced energy needs from previous models. The ease-of-use system eliminates valves at the user end point. They have improved the handwashing practice in the reception centres, encouraging new arrivals to use the taps in a safe and non-destructive way. 

The team’s vision is to expand this successful initiative to other humanitarian settings, enabling more communities to benefit from improved WASH practices. Through their dedication and innovation, they have proven that small changes can make a big difference in transforming lives in even the most challenging of settings.

Taban Denis: Protection for young girls in Kira, Bweyogerere

In the heart of Wakiso district, engineer Taban Denis partnered with the Teenage Mothers and Child Support Foundation (TMCSF), to bring about a life-changing project – the construction of a community spring well.

This initiative aimed not only to provide safe water for thousands of households, but also to protect girls from teenage pregnancies and child marriages.

Prior to the project, the local community relied on a shallow and contaminated ponded spring for their water needs. The spring was often polluted by runoff surface water during rainy seasons, and littered with plastic. For 3,500 households, this meant compromising their health and well-being on a daily basis.

Joining humanitarian and engineering expertise, these projects have assisted communities to respond to disaster and prepare for upcoming risks. Affected communities are empowered to safeguard their local environment, their health, and their economic prospects.

Could you help bring basic provision to transform communities around the world? Give to RedR UK here, or contact fundraising@redr.org.uk to enquire about how you can support us.

If you’re interested in developing your skills, get in touch at training@redr.org.uk or browse our open courses here.

This article contains elements that may be distressing. 

In mid-March, soon after the February earthquake, we sent our Emergency Response Coordinator Mohammed Bashein to Türkiye.

He accompanied the Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team (EEFIT), from the Institution of Structural Engineers, on a research trip to earthquake sites. Mohammed spent ten days with the team as they carried out their research into structural, infrastructural, geotechnic, and humanitarian work that is required. 

For RedR, this was an opportunity to understand the situation on the ground first hand, to inform our ongoing response. “Humanitarians always talk about serving populations,” says Mohammed. “But if we only operate from siloes, ivory towers, and computer screens many miles away we won’t really know or understand.” Insights from the trip have been invaluable in informing our Learning Needs Assessment, freely available to all working in this context.  

Coordination saves lives, and this trip has helped us make more connections. We’re looking forward to bridging the humanitarian and engineering sectors in the region to build a coordination group. We have good connections, for instance, with engineer syndicates in Syria, and we’re also part of the Shelter cluster. We can use our positionality to connect them. 

How can this trip inform ongoing conversations about capacity, power, and privilege? Here, Mohammed shares his reflections and insights.

What was it like to be on the ground? 

“I’ve been to Türkiye many times before, and some of the culture and politics overlaps with Libya, where I’m from. My personal experience in Libya gave me some insight. In the 2019 conflict in Tripoli, my house burnt down, so I had a lot of empathy for how damage affects people’s lives first hand. In each storey of those damaged buildings, you can see a life.

Do any interactions with people you met there stick in your mind? 

“One of our first conversations was with an elder, fixing and building some tents. I greeted him.  

“‘Hi uncle, I hope you and your family are well. I thank God for your safety.’ Lots of people needed to hear that kind of thing. On the night of the earthquake, he had taken his daughter to another city for routine medical treatment. When he returned to a ruined house, he couldn’t get a tent from the government. Someone else had given these to him. He told us that being from Syria undermines you. ‘We’re not a high priority’, he said. ‘But I’m thankful my family are safe, and people help us’. He insisted we stay and have coffee with him.” 

“On another occasion, an elder lady asked us to see her home, even though we explained that we could not carry out any government assessments. She and her four sons were from Syria, but they had been renting this now partially collapsed house for ten years. I tried to give her some psychosocial support. Standing in her courtyard, next to her collapsed house, I told her I recognised her pain. People in this part of the world always pray for you as you speak. ‘I know you can’t do anything’, she said, ‘but you entered my heart. I hope to meet again in better circumstances.’ She said her daughters-in-law could make us some lunch. The moment made me realise the number of shocks these people have been through. I wasn’t sure if I was seeing resilience, or numbness.”  

“Another woman asked us to see her house, although authorities had already told her it must be demolished. I tried to manage her expectations. I didn’t have the authority nor the capacity to assess its structural integrity, and her house had a lot of cracks. She told us she came every day just to be near it. I know from my experience in Tripoli that feeling, of trying to figure out where to start.”

The earthquake has now completely fallen out of the news cycle here in the UK. What are your thoughts about the ongoing need? How can we make a difference? 

Even if you are on the wrong side of those linguistic and cultural barriers, anyone who wants to do good can find a way. It’s a matter of recognising your positionality, including from a socio-historical perspective. Be aware of how you see people, and how they see you.  

“The needs are still there, and there is lots to be done. Many of us are privileged to be in parts of the world, where these are not our problems. That gives us a responsibility to try and mobilise resources.  

In my conversations with friends in the UK, I see that people are very interested to know what’s happening and donate. They want to make an impact. They just want to know how.” 

International Women’s Day this year prompted some reflection. 

It’s been a big year for women’s rights on the international stage, and gender equality is, as ever, precarious. In humanitarian contexts, the issues can be so complex that they appear overwhelming. How do we navigate this cultural, political, and personal struggle in emergency contexts, in which our mandate is to save lives?  

We need to keep talking about gender. We will not fulfil this mandate until we integrate the needs of all people, no matter who they are. We must contextualise this with equally crucial questions about decolonisation and climate change. And as vast as the issues are, we can take a critically hopeful view. What steps can we take so that next International Women’s Day we look at this from a new place?

Why should we keep talking about gender?

When disaster strikes, pre-existing inequalities make women and girls especially vulnerable.

Some contexts show this clearly. Sophie Nyokabi is a RedR UK Associate Trainer and gender equality and integration expert. She works to enhance a gendered response in humanitarian and Disaster Risk Reduction interventions in East Africa. In drought, she says, women and girls bear the brunt of disaster. Women, girls, and boys are fourteen times more likely to die in disasters than men. 

Sophie recommends this video to demonstrate gender differences in the humanitarian crisis in Somalia.

Surely the priority in a crisis, however, is to focus on simply saving lives, rather than use time and resources thinking about inclusion?  

Kate Denman, RedR associate trainer and gender and inclusion specialist, designed our Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion course, as well as gender courses for the MENA and Ukrainian contexts. She was previously RedR UK Programme Manager, where she contributed to the now widely used Minimum Standards for Age and Disability Inclusion in Humanitarian Action, as part of the ADCAP consortium.  

Inequality causes violence

The existential turmoil of a disaster context brings existing inequalities to the surface in a disturbing form – heightened gender-based violence.  

Maria Dmytriyeva is a gender expert from Ukraine, and RedR UK Associate Trainer. She facilitates several courses, including Gender-Based Violence and Prevention of Sexual Exploitation and Abuse.  

As people have lost their incomes, their homes, and their futures, she explains, there are fewer mechanisms to prevent violence. Domestic violence has been growing. Gangs in neighbouring countries traffic a growing number of women leaving Ukraine. “Everything that was bad before the invasion has got worse”, she says. 

The training does make a difference, however, showing people the scale of the issue. “They see how prevalent, yet how hidden it is”, says Maria. “They see how ignoring it will limit people’s chances of rebuilding their lives after the war.” The design of humanitarian programmes can actually make gender-based violence worse, not better. Gender-based violence in refugee centres makes training for Minimum Standards for Camp Management so important.  

If women from affected communities are involved in camp management, they transform outcomes. When they sit on security or food distribution committees, they advocate for crucial factors that no one else has thought about. Will food distribution be early enough for women to walk home before dark? Will water points be in a well-lit, visible, public space? Can women report abuse in safe, culturally appropriate ways?  

A two-pronged approach

We need a new norm to integrate concerns of women and girls (and other marginalised groups) across humanitarian programming. We need a new norm that champions local expertise and supports capacity building at the grassroots. 

In large-scale disasters, the United Nations coordinates a response through the cluster system. But as Sophie notes, “gender equality is not a cluster. Rather, gender equality should cut across clusters. International humanitarian organisations need to strengthen this.  

Sophie facilitates our Climate Change and Disaster Risk Reduction course in East Africa. This work illustrates why gender equality cannot be an afterthought, or an add-on. “Women have a lot of community memory”, she says, “and they know when systems are not working. At grassroots, whether in a feeding system, inoculation of children, or cattle dipping, women are in touch with the community’s nervous system. A bounce back integrating women’s perspectives is stronger, faster, and more sustainable.”  

Although we’ve come a long way, as Kate reflects, “we’ve still not got this right. There are contexts where the shift towards gender equality is so massive that it almost appears too difficult.” Nonetheless, we must design projects which integrate needs of all affected people. More than including some element of ‘women’s issues’ into the remit of our programmes, we must change methodology and mindset, integrating listening into our training and practice. 

Women as leaders

Local women need to be the leaders. In a Somali community ravaged by drought and economic challenges arising from the pandemic, businesses have been lost. But Sophie has been involved in setting up Village Saving and Loan Associations (VSLAs), training women to manage collective saving and crediting groups. “Once they have started saving, we take things a notch higher and support them into entrepreneurship. We support them with literacy and mentorship. I have seen how it has benefitted women, enabling them to take advantage of opportunities.”  

Caroline Wanene is a social development consultant and RedR UK Associate Trainer. Although she doesn’t facilitate courses focused on gender, she advocates for a deliberate gender focus, no matter the topic. But Caroline doesn’t only teach others how to include women in her programmes – she lives it out, working to give a voice to women in her training. She says, “I am always asking myself – do the women on my courses get lost between the cracks?” When the participant list has a minority of women, Caroline seeks them out, to ensure they can participate fully.

Gender inclusivity goes hand in hand with decolonisation. Decolonisation is recognition of the injustices and hypocrisy perpetuated by high-income countries through humanitarian aid, alongside action to repair imbalances of power. The counties that provide funds for aid are also those that continue to benefit from exploiting others in low-income countries. Because much work on gender has come from high-income countries, done by white women, propagating feminism from this context is a colonial approach. Kate poses the million-dollar question. “How can white women from high-income countries contribute to work for gender equality that is not led by us? We need to support women from the contexts where disaster happens, to make the decisions and set the agenda.”  

Through action from governments, UN bodies, and the world’s biggest NGOs, women’s capacities and perspectives must be integrated into humanitarian response. At the same time, it is imperative to support capacity at the grassroots, through the world’s most vulnerable people, so that this can happen. This is the two-pronged approach. 

What can humanitarian organisations do?

Women and men can lead their own disaster response. When discussing gender-based violence in Ukraine, Maria strikes an encouraging note of emphasis. The strong civil society in Ukraine and in neighbouring countries has played a crucial role in humanitarian response. “Without it”, she says, “the situation would be a lot worse. These efforts should not only be acknowledged, but properly funded. International funding needs to reach the local level, which often goes without.”  

Aseel Shakboua is a gender and protection expert, and RedR UK Learning and Development Coordinator. As Senior Gender-Based Violence Specialist for UNICEF in Iraq, she previously worked to prevent gender-based violence in areas recently under ISIS control. She is now revising all our materials, and developing systems to ensure we mainstream gender equality. “In our recruitment and all our activities, even in the details, we should apply this lens”, she says. We need our response to be a gendered response.  

For those designing projects, this can be quite overwhelming. Training can give an orientation to resources, and an opportunity for self-reflection. Are you inclusive? Do you take time to listen to all perspectives? Is gender equality mainstreamed and integrated, through women’s capacity to speak and lead?  

For individuals, these vast systemic issues are even more overwhelming. There is always a part to play, however. Like Caroline, you can ensure you listen to people who are usually overlooked. You can take steps to strengthen your own understanding and capacity to respond to injustices around you. Take all opportunities to advocate for those who are not the loudest in the room.  
 

Resources

The GBVAOR website includes diverse resources and an online community of practice for gender-based violence specialists.

Safe referral training equips those without specialist knowledge on gender-based violence to refer a survivor to the right places. 

The International Rescue Committee has a comprehensive programme engaging men and boys to prevent gender-based violence.   

This guide produced by the Women’s Refugee Council addresses sexual violence against men, boys, and LGBTIQ+ individuals.  

The Aid Reimagined website has good questions about linking different aspects of an inclusive and decolonised response. 

The New Humanitarian | Decolonising Aid: A reading and resource list 

A Bond guide to localisation for international NGOs.